Anyone else the acting in this episode was overdone? I really think this was a crappy episode and that isnt looking good.
Here is another Daemon's TV Giveaway for True Blood . You can enter to win a True Blood Prize Pack, which includes: - One True Blood Comic Con Bag - One Charlaine Harris Book Dead Until Dark (on which True Blood is based) Check out The Giveaway for True Blood here.
It looks after one episode, Tara, a light-skinned africian american girl. Now in episode 2, replacing her is a different africian american girl. I like the first one, the attitude suited her. Did she get replaced, or is there 2 characters with the same name?
While I'm not a vampire show fanatic, I've found myself strangely drawn to True Blood and have really enjoyed the first 2 episodes. I think what I most enjoy is Sookie's character as she's endearing plus very intelligent and intriguing, and I really think her acting and character are the main draw of the show so far. So vampire fans and non-vampire fans, what do you think? After watching the 2nd episode, are you a total True Blood fan or are you still waiting for more vampirey-goodness to satisfy you? Personally, I'm happy with the level of vampire weirdness, but do you need more or less to keep watching?
Both have potential... But which is better?!?!?
Could it be a clue? Take a look at at the painting in the office of Merlotte's. When Sam takes Sookie in to talk to her in episode to they briefly freeze on the painting. The painting is of a young blond child being watched over in a field by a dog. Suspiciously the dog looks similar to the one we have seen many times and the child could be a young Sookie. We know she is not what she seems (just a bar waitress) but could the old painting be a clue? Thoughts?