Discussion
Topics:
Did you cry(Season 9 Ep.1 Spoiler)
Any fan out there shed a tear as Warrick died in Grissoms arms? I felt the pain cos its hard loosing a character whose been there for so long through all the tough times, but i guess "hes off to better things" hopefully.
loading | by 
jasterix88
Send a Compliment at 0:42 PDT, 10 October, 2008
Comments (9 comments)
I sobbed the whole way through even though Warrick was probably my least favourite CSI. Very sad episode. I'm surprised Catherine and Nick were not more upset tbh, especially when they were processing the car
yeah i agree more tears from all the characters would have been good it was nice to see Sarah back for this episode even though she could not do much here's to a great season hopefully
He really died????!!!!!!?????? OMFG, some ass on some website wrote that he didn't die, and I sat through the whole episode waiting for him to come back!!! That stupid ass totally ruined the episode for me!!!
Bloody hell, they killed off one of the most interesting and hot character! Warrick, Grissom and Sarah are all leaving, who the bloody hell is left?
I cried too, but only in the very end at the funeral. I liked they were not crying all the way through, I think it'd be too much. They were obviously grieving, even without tears. Makes it more realistic to have silent grievers, too.
warrick was my fav, i cried like a baby all d way thru.
btw wat waz up wit sarah n dat hair do 'n' attire? she looked like she needed help ASAP.
I almost cried, I got really choked up when I seen how the team got together to try and solve the case, or when Grissom was holding him in his final moments, and at the funeral. I think it's a tragedy that this happened and think that the show just isn't the same.
I jsut started watching the show again after his death. I am so pissed off! I mean, don't gt me wrong, they have to mix up the hsow a bit, make it like "real Life," and tehy haven't killed off a main character since season one. But still. Did they really have to kill of Warrick? I mean, REALLY?!!? WTF?!?!? When Jorja left they didn't kill off Sara, and when William leaves/left(?) they aren't/didn't kill him off. So just because Gary was having some "issues" didn't mean they had to kill of Warrick. He could ahve left for "personal" reasons. GRRRRRRR!!!!!!! They could have left it open. *can anyone tell I'm pissed?* This just pisses me off royaly! They could have left him alive. And now they throw this stupid little b**ch in our faces as the new CSI and I'm supposed to sit up here and accepted her with open arms and be all welcoming. Hell no! I just lost one of my fav. carachters on the show and I'm supposed to be happy and releaved that there's a new girl on the team. Phht! WTG CBS and TPTB, you did a wonderful job! NOT!
Ok, mini rant out of the way. I was holding on to all hope that Warrick would come back. Even after he died in Griss' arms I was waiting for him to come back some kind of way. I even expected them to show him after the funeral, like in some witness protection programe, and that it was all faked. *sigh* I wish it ended that way, but, no, they really KILLED him off. I cried off and on through the whole eppie. And when I saw that he was trying to get full custody of his son. God, that ripped my heart out someting fierce. Poor Warrick's son. I hate that it ended this way. Could have gone better.
Im confused about Warrick's son. On a previous episode Warrick was on the phone to Tina saying "why dont you ask the father of your unborn child" meaning she had an affair and was probably why they got divorced, but at the funeral she was holding a baby, so does that mean that Warrick is the father of Tina's baby, or is the son completely separate from that storyline?
No, that's his son. They had a DNA test done for the custody hearing from my understaing. Or to make better sense, Warrick had the DNA testing done out of questions, what if the baby was his.